Keywordsdental lab scanner vs intraoral scannerintraoral scanner vs lab scannerwhich dental scannerchairside vs lab scanningintraoral scanner accuracy
The scanner question is really a workflow question: do you capture at the chair, or do you digitise a physical impression at the bench? Both feed the same CAD/CAM chain, but they suit different practices.
Intraoral scanner
- No physical impression — more comfortable for the patient and faster turnaround.
- Enables same-day, chairside dentistry with an in-house printer or mill.
- True-color capture improves shade communication and patient education.
Lab scanner
- Highest accuracy (≤0.005 mm per ISO 12836) for model and die work.
- Handles full-arch and articulated cases the clinic scanner struggles with.
- Fits labs that receive conventional impressions or prints to scan.
How to choose
| If you are… | Start with |
|---|---|
| A clinic wanting same-day dentistry | Intraoral (e.g. Ai-30 handheld) |
| A lab digitising plaster models | Lab scanner (AI-S3/S6/S9) |
| Mixed practice | Both — they share open STL/OBJ/PLY export |
Both lines export open formats and avoid vendor lock-in; compare the full intraoral and lab scanner range and match accuracy and throughput to your case mix.
Scan to add on WeChat