Keywordspeek vs titaniumpeek vs zirconiaframework material comparisonimplant framework choicedental framework
Choosing a framework material is a trade of weight, abrasion, and radiolucency — not just strength.
The three contenders
| PEEK | Titanium | Zirconia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strength | ~90 MPa | ~900 MPa | 900–1200 MPa |
| Radio-lucent | Yes | No | No |
| Abrades antagonist | No | Yes (mild) | Yes |
Read it clinically
PEEK is kindest to opposing teeth and shows bone on X-ray, but too flexible for long spans. Titanium and zirconia are stronger but hide peri-implant bone and can wear enamel.
Machine PEEK frames from our PEEK discs for short, tissue-friendly spans.
Three-way framework choice
| Property | PEEK | Titanium | Zirconia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modulus | 3–4 GPa | 110 GPa | 200 GPa |
| Weight | Lowest | Mid | Mid |
| Bond | Needs silica | Easy | Easy |
| Cost | Low | Mid | High |
When PEEK wins
For a lightweight RPD or a patient with metal sensitivity, PEEK is the pick. For a rigid full-arch implant bridge, titanium or zirconia holds the span.